The Conservation Blog

January 2010 | February 2010 

March 2010

April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010

July 2010

July 28th, 2010: Guest Columnist Jamie Kenworthy

Why is the future of the Knik Arm Bridge about to move to the next session of the legislature?

Because of a fact that has yet to be reported in the media.  Both financial scenarios that the Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority (KABATA) quietly gave to the Department of Revenue on March 23, 2010 require state support.  In the first, the state just finances the $686 million Phase I project itself and the legislature would have to annually appropriate the necessary revenue to cover the bond payments on the debt payments that the toll revenue cannot cover. In the second scenario, a private partner would put up 9% of the expected costs (and get 64% of the projected return) with the state guaranteeing through a letter of credit the annual payments to the private partner to cover the expected toll shortfall.

But wasn’t the Bridge supposed to be a Public Private Partnership with no further state support than the original $114 million in state and federal funds?  Well that was the story KABATA told community councils last spring and broadcast on radio ads the year before.  And with some vague hedging, that what was the story KABATA told the Anchorage Assembly on March 16, 2010 and AMATS (the transportation decision-making body for Anchorage) nine days later when AMATS with the support of Mayor Sullivan’s vote and state representatives kept the Bridge in the short term funding list.  

At both the Assembly and AMATS meetings, public representatives asked for a simple spread sheet showing how the project was financially feasible with no further state support required.  That March 23 Department of Revenue spread sheet was never produced and only recently came to light after a public records request.  An earlier version of Bridge finances, using KABATA’s estimate on costs and the federal estimate of revenue, shows that bridge deficits in the first 10 years of operation would  approximately be equal to the $24 million/year either Anchorage or the Mat Su Borough receive in total state and federal transportation funding – that’s roads, public transportation, bikeways, and potholes combined.  See www.knikbridgefacts.org for the full spread sheet numbers.

KABATA’s basic problem, and why Juneau is now in their sights, is too few trips to support such a costly bridge.  Besides avoiding a $5 one way car toll, the Glenn is a shorter route to Anchorage for folks living in Palmer and Wasilla.  So their optimistic revenue projections have to assume a 2030 Mat Su population of 250,000 to approach alleged financial feasibility.  

The Mat Su population today is approximately 85,000.  The number that the University of Alaska’s Institute of Social and Economic Research uses for Mat Su in 2030 is 169,000 and that is the number used to model the now stalled Highway to Highway project.  

But the ISER number was too low to produce the trips and resulting toll revenue necessary for KABATA’s financial plan so a Texas firm, Global Insights Research, was then hired to come up with the 250,000 population figure KABATA uses to try to demonstrate financial feasibility.  For Mat Su to have 250,000 by 2030 means the Borough would have to add the population of Palmer, the Borough’s second largest city, to the Borough every year for the next 20 years.  

Before the AMATS Policy Committee voted on the Bridge project, the AMATS Technical Committee highlighted the overestimated population number for the Policy Committee.  But the Policy Committee ignored that issue when they decided not to move the project to the long term plan.   Those opposed to the Bridge are now asking the state Department of Transportation and the Governor to have KABATA rerun the revenue numbers with the realistic 169,000 number that ISER uses for the 2030 Mat Su Borough population.

This fall will see significant backroom maneuvering on two unresolved issues that must be settled prior to the Bridge getting a Record of Decision on the Environmental Impact Statement.  The National Marine Fisheries Service has not yet signed off on the Bridge design because the threat the gravel-filled causeway design could pose to the Cook Inlet beluga and salmon populations.  And the construction of Port McKenzie and the causeway design may exacerbate the siltation issues that already affect large ships coming into Knik Arm to the expanding Port of Anchorage.

If either the beluga or siltation issues cannot be resolved, the existing cheaper 8,200 foot causeway design moves to a 14,000 foot span and Bridge costs move from the current stratospheric level to deep space.  

Bottom line, when legislative candidates come to your door this summer and fall, ask if they support further state funds for the Bridge or a state revenue guarantee for Bridge bonds which will quickly turn into the same thing.  My conservative estimate is that even with the cheaper 8,200 foot span, Bridge deficits will over time come close to a billion dollar cumulative deficit.  Even for Alaska’s state government, that’s real money and we’re likely to need those funds for other priorities.  

Jamie Kenworthy is Chair of the Board of Alaska Conservation Voters. This column represents his own opinion and not that of Alaska Conservation Alliance.

July 26th, 2010: 2010 Tileston Award

Wednesday afternoon found the Alliance staff on the third floor of the Dena’ina Center for the Third Annual Tileston Awards presentation. The Tileston Award is a uniquely Alaskan award established to honor organizations, individuals, projects and/or businesses that create solutions and innovations promoting the linkages between economic development and environmental protection.  The award presentation, held immediately following the Resource Development Council’s annual meeting, enjoyed a great turnout.  Caitlin Higgins, our very own Executive Director, kicked off the presentation by reminding us all of the reason for the award; that strong economical growth and environmentally responsible business practices can go hand in hand. Peg and Jules Tileston, legendary Alaskan conservationists and the namesakes of this award, presented the awards to both recipients coupled with speeches listing each group’s merits.     

This year, the award was given to two recipients as both of the applications were so impressive that a decision between the two could not be made.  They were both awarded for their strong commitments to conservation and development.  Granite Construction, the first recipient recognized, was nominated for its Birchwood Site development. As demand for gravel for both private and public projects grows, Granite Construction has proven that a business model based on respect for surrounding communities and the environment is both profitable and good business.  Working on the Birchwood project, Granite took several extra steps to mitigate noise issues and installed water testing wells to detect any unexpected changes to water quality in the area.  

William Jack Hernandez Sport Fish Hatchery, the second award recipient, plays a vital role in Alaska’s communities, outdoor culture, and tourist appeal.  Alaska’s sport fisheries have an estimated annual economic impact of $1.4 billion through the sale of in- and out- of state fishing licenses, fishing tackle, guided trips, food lodging, and other direct and indirect expenditures.  A message of conservation and sustainability is present throughout the new hatchery, from public exhibits and a meeting space that overlooks the fish production area to the engineering design and energy efficiency methods incorporated into the building’s operating systems. 

The Alaska Conservation Alliance would like to thank our Tileston Award presentation guests, Jason Brune and the Resource Development Council, and Jules and Peg Tileston, and of course the 2010 Tileston Award Winners Granite Construction and the Hernandez Hatchery.  Their efforts to lead the way in environmentally-responsible business practices are an inspiration to us all and proof that we can promote both economic and environmental interests. 

Check out our Picasa Album for more pictures!

 

July 14th, 2010

 

Energy Policy Public Opinion Snapshot

Anna Fahey

Sightline Institute

 

This is a pivotal moment for energy policy in the United States. The public’s attention is focused on the environmental and economic dangers of domestic oil extraction. Important energy legislation stands before the Senate. At the same time, polling shows that Americans are ready for real energy reform.

Following is a round-up of recent polling data:

After the spill: Public shifts toward environmental protection

 

 . Even as early as May 27, Gallup polling found that the Gulf oil spill led to a shift in Americans’ views on the balance between pursuing energy supplies and environmental protection. In March, by 50 to 43 percent, Americans said it was more important to develop US energy supplies than to protect the environment, continuing a trend in the direction seen since 2007. By mid-May, following heavy news coverage of the oil spill, the majority had shifted to favor environmental protection, by 55 to 39 percent—the second-largest percentage (behind 58 percent in 2007) favoring the environment in the 10-year history of the question.

 . Similarly, a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll of adults taken on June 16, the day after President Obama’s Oval Office energy address, found an 18 percent swing towards opposition to increased drilling compared to a similar poll taken three weeks prior. And a New York Times/CBS News poll, from June 16 – 20, found that by a large margin, the public over all said more regulation of offshore drilling to protect the environment was needed. (76 percent), and a large majority has little faith in the oil industry generally to act in the public interest (74 percent).

 . A Washington post-ABC News poll from June 3 – 6 found that just a quarter of Americans back expanding offshore drilling in the wake of the BP oil spill.

Broad, consistent support for energy reform and regulation:

 

. The latest Wall Street Journal-NBC Poll—conducted June 17 – 21—found overwhelming support for clean energy legislation. Respondents favored comprehensive energy and carbon pollution reduction legislation by 63 percent to 31 percent – a two to one margin. When asked “Do you support or oppose an energy proposal designed to reduce carbon emissions and increase the use of alternative and renewable energy sources, even if it means an increase in the cost of energy?,” 63 percent said they support such a proposal—36 percent strongly support it. Significantly, strong support for this legislation was double the strong opposition. Seventy-two percent favor Obama’s proposals to develop alternative sources of energy and reduce the amount of oil and other fossil fuels produced and used in the US.

. A New York Times/CBS News poll, from June 16 – 20, found that overwhelmingly, Americans think the nation needs a fundamental overhaul of its energy policies (89 percent). A majority expects alternative forms of energy to replace oil as a major source within 25 years (59 percent).

 . A Washington post-ABC News poll from June 3 – 6 asked “do you think the federal government should or should not regulate the release of greenhouse gases from sources like power plants, cars and factories in an effort to reduce global warming?” A total of 71 percent agreed the government should (52 percent strongly agreed).

 . An early June poll by Benenson Strategy Group, on behalf of the League of Conservation Voters, found that 66 percent of Americans polled agree with the statement that, “British Petroleum must pay for the damage they’ve done. But our addiction to oil threatens our security and we need more than a band-aid for that. Senators need to pass real reforms to hold polluters accountable and invest in clean American energy.” Sixty-eight percent said that the federal government should be regulating corporate polluters more.

 

. Notably, the Benenson Strategy Group poll still showed strong support for an energy reform bill--by 64 to 25 percent--even after respondents heard an opposition text packed with all the standard anti-climate legislation buzz phrases: “cap and tax,” “job-killer,” “pay more at the pump,” “cost for struggling middle class families,” “taxpayers’ hard-earned money for a wasteful Washington program,” etc.

 . A Yale / George Mason poll, conducted May 14 –June 1, found that 77 percent support regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant (up 6 percent from January 2010).

 . According to another Benenson Strategy Group poll, conducted May 4 – 6, commissioned by Clean Energy Works, overall, 61 percent of 2010 voters support and just 31 percent oppose a bill “that will limit pollution, invest in domestic energy sources and encourage companies to use and develop clean energy. It would do this in part by charging energy companies for carbon pollution in electricity or fuels like oil.”

 . A Roper / Stanford University poll, conducted June 1 – 7, found overwhelming support for government action to” limit the amount of greenhouse gases that US businesses put out.” A 76/20 majority is in favor of such limits.

 

Economic benefits of clean energy policy—good business, more jobs:

 

. The Wall Street Journal-NBC Poll—conducted June 17 – 21—found that 69 percent of respondents feel that Obama’s proposals to develop alternative sources of energy and reduce the amount of oil and other fossil fuels produced and used in the US would increase the number of available jobs in the US. Seventy-nine percent felt that such proposals would make life better for the next generation of Americans.

 . On June 9, Small Business Majority released the findings of a national poll of 800 small business owners’ opinions on clean energy and climate legislation. A majority (61 percent) agree that moving the country to clean energy will help restart the economy and help small businesses create jobs, and 58 percent think that adopting new energy policies will transform the economy and they want their business to be a part of it. A solid fifty percent support policy that would “put a price on carbon emissions from energy sources like oil and coal, so companies would have to pay if they release these emissions into the air.” Interestingly, 78 percent of African-American and 60 percent of Hispanic small business owners support such policy.

 . A Roper / Stanford University poll, conducted June 1 – 7, found that the public is not buying the conservative argument that action on global warming will cost jobs. Just 18 percent accept that argument, while 50 percent think such action will actually produce more jobs (another 31 percent say “no effect”).

 

July 9th, 2010

 

REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE

We’ve all heard the slogan, but have you ever really thought about the words and how they apply to you?  Many people and families all over Alaska recycle.  Most of us also reuse major items; let’s be honest, it’s cheaper to do that.  But do you really consider your consumption and ways you can REDUCE the waste you and your family produce?  
Did you know?
-    Americans use 2.5 million plastic bottles every HOUR
-    Plastic bags and other plastic waste in the ocean kill 1 million sea creatures annually
-    To produce the country’s Sunday newspapers, each week 500,000 trees must be cut down
Wow.  That is a staggering amount of waste.  It is also a huge negative impact to our environment that everyday people have the power to stop.  Here are some tips on how you can help:
-    Use reusable shopping bags.  These bags are inexpensive and actually hold more than their flimsy plastic counterparts.  You can also buy reusable produce bags to replace the disposable plastic ones that you put your veggies and fruit in every week.
-    Instead of buying plastic water bottles, fill up your own reusable water bottle.
-    Cancel your newspaper subscription.  Instead, sit down with your laptop and cup of coffee in the morning and read your news online.
-    Most businesses that you interact with give you the option to receive your statements or bills online.  Choose that option.  Think of all the trees you would be saving per year if your insurance statements, mortgage and utility bills, and your bank statements were NEVER printed on paper.
-    Limit the amount of disposable paper products in your home.  Use real dishes and silverware instead of plastic ones and real cloth napkins and rags instead of paper napkins and paper towel.  
-    Instead of sending your kiddo to school with a lunch that contains disposable Ziploc baggies and juice boxes, consider reusable containers to hold their sandwiches, drinks, and snacks.
In addition to helping our planet, most of these things also save you money.  When you implement these changes the earth will thank you, and so will your wallet.

 

 

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

     

        Recently, the Alaska State Legislature passed HB 306, State Energy Policy, and SB 220, Alaska Sustainable Energy Act.  Both of these pieces of legislation put Alaska on the path to a clean and sustainable energy future.  These milestone bills are great and we applaud the legislators and stakeholders who helped pass this legislation.  Included in these bills is a statewide goal of a 50% energy efficiency improvement over the next 15. 

 

      

So how can Alaskans help support this goal in their everyday life?  Here is just one mind-boggling statistic as proof that individual people and families can impact energy usage.

 

•    According to Energy Star, if every American home replaced just one light with a CFL bulb, we would save enough energy to light more than 3 million homes per year (about $700 million in energy costs) and prevent greenhouse emissions per year equivalent to the emissions of about 800,000 cars.  

 

Here are some simple and easy ways that you and your family can actually help Alaska realize our energy efficiency goals:

 

•    Switch your light bulbs to CFLs (compact fluorescent bulbs).

 

 

•    When buying new appliances look for Energy Star appliances.  Here in AK, persons with disabilities are eligible to receive rebates on energy efficient appliances.  Click here for the details.

 

 

•    Schedule an energy audit for your home.  This relatively inexpensive audit of your home will tell you what improvements you can make to upgrade your home’s energy efficiency rating such as weather stripping, additional insulation, etc.  In Alaska, the Home Energy Rebate program will reimburse you for many of those costs. For more information please see AHFC’s website or click here

.

 

•    Phone chargers, TVs, DVD players, computers, stereos, basically any electronic device use power (known as the phantom power drain) even when not turned on.  You can prevent this by unplugging those items when not in use or by using a power strip.  Read about it by clicking here.

 

 

•    For more tips, check out this interactive program that will take you on a room by room energy efficiency ‘tour’ of a home: http://www.touchstoneenergysavers.com/homeAudits.html

 

 

Remember, especially in this depressed economic state, that energy efficiency not only lessens our environmental impact but also saves us money. Energy saved in your home is energy you don’t have to pay for.

 

 

 

Friday, July 2nd, 2010

               This year, Alaskans have the opportunity to let their government know that they care about the state’s future. That they believe in a future where a strong economy and a healthy environment go hand in hand. That they want their leaders to make good on the promises made by the recent Renewable Energy Policy. That they want Alaska to be a  leader in energy efficiency and an example of the ways that development and conservation can work together. And all they have to do is vote.

               That’s why Alaska Conservation Alliance is getting out the word about voting by mail. We know that schedules are busy, especially around election time. That’s why we encourage Alaskans to apply for a mail-in ballot – it ensures that their voice is heard in Juneau, no matter where they are on election day. Voting by mail is not only convenient – it is as safe and secure as voting in person. Having a ballot on the kitchen table also gives you time to think your choices over instead of rushing in and out of a polling both in the middle of your busy day.

               This summer, we’ll be out talking to folks about what matters to them and making sure their voices are heard. In a state where 20 elections since 1960 have been decided by less than 100 votes, every vote counts, and the outcome of this year’s elections will be crucial to the direction Alaska takes in the coming years. Keep an eye on this website for more information on how to register and vote, and don’t let a chance to shape your community’s future pass you by!

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

It’s the year 2035 and Alaska is home to many miles of coniferous forests, net-busting catches of wild salmon, good wages, interesting work, fall hunts and one-of-a-kind cultures. Alaska 2035 sounds like a good place to live.

As in most times, 2035 Alaska is a mix of enormous natural beauty and the evidence of man’s creative drive to test boundaries and overcome challenges. If Alaska is as bountiful a quarter century from now as it is today, how was this bounty achieved and paid for? A good start was the passage of clean energy legislation in the spring of 2010.

Some History
The passage of Senate Bill 220, the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act, and House Bill 306, the State Energy Policy, marked a turning point in Alaska’s years-long progress on renewable energy and energy efficiency.

As little as five months before the bills were passed into law, it was by no means certain that Alaska would act in time to realize its full potential in the clean energy economy – or even provide its residents with home-grown energy! Dated electrical generation strategies, Cook Inlet’s dwindling stockpiles natural gas, the volatility of fossil fuel prices and impending carbon costs were sparking debate about diversifying Alaska’s energy portfolio. Yet there was no plan for where Alaska wanted to go, or how it was going to get there. Coal-fired power plants can operate for 50 years or more and hydroelectric projects routinely outlive the century mark - the energy decisions Alaskans made in the young millennium’s first decade are still affecting the Alaska of 2035.

With strong energy efficiency provisions to ensure wise energy use, as well as the Emerging Energy Technology Fund promoting innovation, Alaska is closer than ever to achieving our vision of a sustainable energy future. Together, the state's Energy Policy and Sustainable Energy Act set the goals and created the incentives that we needed to get to where we are today.

The Railbelt Elecricity Efficiency Landscape (REEL) Report, released in 2010, conservatively estimated that at least a $1 billion in economic activity and 10,000 jobs could come from a growing clean energy economy by 2025. This kind of sustainable development, as well as the natural riches of Alaska’s natural gas reserves and the construction of the Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline, made our state a leader in energy innovation. Alaska’s citizens own the state's resources; through smart and measured development we have been their beneficiaries.

With all the money saved on fuel through energy efficiency measures, Alaskan families can afford a well-deserved vacation.  Their destinations might include a trip along the Inside Passage to Juneau, the Kenai Peninsula, Fairbanks, Chena Hot Springs, Denali and Arctic Alaska. Let’s follow one of these journeys, and along the way we’ll see what’s changed – and what’s stayed the same – since these landmark pieces of legislation were passed.

Read more....

Monday, June 21st, 2010

8am-REAP's 2nd Annual Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

The Renewable Energy Alaska Project (REAP) hosted its second annual Business of Clean Energy in Alaska conference last week and the event was dynamite!  Featuring speakers from Alaska and around the world, presenters focused on the economic benefits of renewable energy generation, energy efficiency, job creation and opportunities for growing these sector in Alaska.  As REAP notes in their agenda, “The cleantech sector, including renewable energy technology and generation, accounted for about 25% of all private sector venture capital investment in 2009 – more than software, biotech or any other category.”  Check out REAP’s website for more information: http://alaskarenewableenergy.org/events/conference-business-of-clean-energy-in-alaska/.

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

It’s official – House Bill 306, the Statewide Energy Policy bill, and Senate Bill 220, the Sustainable Energy Act, were both signed into law by Governor Parnell yesterday afternoon at the Dena’ina Center.  And man does that feel good! 

Both bills are a big step in the right direction for Alaska.  They set goals for renewable energy and energy efficiency, provide a vision for the state and setup the specific programs and funding to start moving towards those goals. For more specifics on the bill, please visit Alaska Conservation Voters’ Conservation Watch:  http://acvoters.org/legislative-session/conservation-watch/conservation-watch-28-4-20-2010.  And check out photos below from the event!

"This legislation sets in statute a state energy policy to meet Alaska's current and future energy needs," said Governor Sean Parnell.

"Alaska now has an energy roadmap," said Rep. Millett. "HB 306 creates an overarching energy policy for the legislature, the governor, power producers, and Alaskans, and it will be used to guide decisions about energy for generations to come."

"Weatherizing 25 percent of the state's most inefficient buildings across the state, we estimated the state can save $3 million per year," said Sen. Bill Wielechowski of the Sustainable Energy Act. 

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

11am- Energy at the National Women's Leadership Summit by our own Caitlin Higgins

At the National Women’s Leadership Summit held last week in Anchorage, our own Sen. Murkowski said it best.  “This forum is a unique opportunity for us to address the serious challenges confronting our nation and develop sound, sustainable policies that also safeguard our security and strengthen the economy. I can think of no better place to hold the summit than our nation’s last frontier, a place critical to America’s path forward on energy and the environment.”

The summit focused on energy and what different investments and different tracks might mean for nation’s overall energy future.  With the oil spill crisis in the Gulf of Mexico, rising energy costs, national security issues and Alaska being an energy state, energy as a topic was not only timely, but very relevant to most people’s daily lives.  I was fortunate enough to be a panelist at the National Women’s Leadership Summit and I was struck by the energy savvy of the different women in attendance.  These summit participants were all intelligent, dedicated, respectful of all opinions, professional and resourceful, and I want to thank them for the differing perspectives they brought to the table of what a better energy future really means and how we get there.  As a representative of a conservation organization, I advocated for stronger energy efficiency practices first and foremost, followed by greater investments in renewable energy technology.  Others saw a larger role for traditional fossil fuels and new technological developments in that field, though everyone agreed that clean energy generation needs to become a larger part of our energy portfolio. 

In spite of the different opinions on which energy track to take, our energy future seems to come down to a not-so-simple choice: what do we want?  As one of my fellow panelists astutely pointed out, there’s no magic switch that will transition our nation away from the energy sources of yesterday, it will take time and a dedicated effort.  We all know the reasons to transition away from fossil fuels - security and energy independence, health issues like mercury emissions and asthma, CO2 emissions which contribute to climate change, water contamination and safety issues in terms of fuel extraction and combustion.  Fossil fuels are very water intensive and because there has to be a constant fuel source, over the long run fossil fuels will be more expensive.  They are also likely to incur additional expenses from carbon taxes.  And finally, despite improving the efficiency of our fossil fuel use, the bottom line is that they will eventually run out.  These are limited energy sources and from an investment standpoint, it makes much more sense to put resources into energy sources that are by far cleaner, allows us to be more energy independent, improves our national security, are more stably priced, cheaper over the long run and of course, renewable.  

This isn’t to say that a transition to greater energy efficiency and renewable energy use doesn’t have hurdles to be overcome, such as accessibility, storage and supply continuity – the wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine.  But the tides are steady, the earth’s core holds its temperature and enhanced transmission capacity and battery storage can help ensure that energy supplies are more constant.  Doesn’t it make the most sense to invest in solving these problems instead of investing in new technology to help us get to the last remaining and most difficult to reach fossil fuel reserves which still have other negative consequences?  Especially when so many different companies, entrepreneurs, NGO’s and villages right here in Alaska and around the world and spurring new innovations, creating jobs, saving money and making money while doing it.   

If we do choose clean energy it won’t be a 100% transition, because even the most optimistic projections include some fossil fuel use into the foreseeable future.  Yet we have the capacity to make a dramatic, measurable shift in reducing our energy use through efficiencies and the vast majority of our new energy coming from clean sources.  Incentives, initiatives, mandates, financing options, best business practices and personal choices can all play a part and America should be the leader of this burgeoning new sector.  Of all the different opinions and perspectives at the National Women’s Leadership Summit, we all did agree that greater efficiency and renewable energy use was a good thing.  Why not choose to invest in more of a good thing. 

Monday, June 7, 2010

11:00am- Conservation Community Meets with Senator Begich

Senator Mark Begich met with several members of the Alaska Conservation Alliance last Tuesday to talk about both state and national environmental issues.  A variety of groups representing public health, local communities and conservation organizations were on hand and discussions ranged from climate change and public transportation to toxic substances control, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill crisis and fisheries management.  Alliance member groups found common ground with the Senator on several issues and as the topic turned to the offshore drilling in Alaska, Senator Begich argued strongly in favor of opening Alaska’s coastal waters.  While not all of the Alliance member groups may agree with this position, there is consensus that any offshore drilling in our state would face unique arctic challenges and must be done with the strongest environmental standards possible.  Thank you Senator Begich and staff for the opportunity to meet and talk about conservation issues.

Friday, June 4, 2010

9:35AM--Governor Parnell Cuts Renewable Energy Funding in Half

 

After months of deliberation, the state legislature capital budget included a $50 million allocation to carry out the third round of grants in the Renewable Energy Fund.  Created three years ago, the Fund supports renewable energy projects around rural and urban Alaska.  The first rounds have funded wind farms, wind-diesel projects, hydropower development, and other power generation, while creating hundreds of jobs.  In a year with high oil prices and an energy shortage looming in the Railbelt, Governor Sean Parnell Thursday cut legislature appropriated funding for renewable energy in Alaska by half from $50 to $25 million.

Governor Parnell touted his tendency toward fiscal conservatism in explaining the $25 million cut. With the Renewable Energy Fund veto and other budget appropriations that were cut, the governor plans to save money for future use in Alaska.  Although wisely spending state money should always be a priority, Gov. Parnell's decision leaves much room for debate.  The Renewable Energy Fund creates jobs, reduces energy dependence by diversifying Alaska's portfolio, and protects the environment.  With Alaskan unemployment rates and energy prices hovering at their highest levels in years, the choice to reduce renewable spending now has been questioned by many Alaskans.  Please see the Alaska state website at gov.state.ak.us for more information on the 2011 budget and Governor Parnell's tough decisions.

 

Thursday, June 3, 2010

10:45AM--Renewable Energy Legislation Signed Into Law

In a sunny ceremony attended by prominent legislators and energy producers yesterday at Kincaid Park, Anchorage, Governor Sean Parnell signed two important pieces of legislation aimed at increasing private sector investment in Alaska's clean energy network.  By committing SB 243 and SB 277 to law, Alaska has taken two more steps toward meeting its goals of 50% electric generation from renewable resources by 2025.

Senate Bill 277 exempts certain renewable energy projects from oversight by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska and municipalities.  The bill emerged in response to findings that highly regulated markets present a barrier to entry for renewable energy providers.  Sponsored by the Senate Energy Committee, the legislation aims to find the middle ground of protecting Alaskan ratepayers while encouraging renewable development to meet the state's growing energy needs.

Senate Bill 243, sponsored by Senator Lesil McGuire, deals specifically with geothermal resource development.  Alaska previously had the nation's highest geothermal royalty rate, which translated to low levels of development, energy generation, and state revenue.  The new law will set the state rate to be commensurate with federal levels, encouraging geothermal exploration at sites like Mt. Spur and others that have the potential to provide clean power for thousands of Alaskan citizens, urban and rural.

Both of these bills demonstrate ways the state government can work to promote clean energy solutions for a sustainable future, and Alaskans should be proud of this progress and expect the trend toward affordable clean energy to continue.

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

1:15PM--Alliance Organizations Act to Protect Alaskan Waters

Alaskans concerned with conservation issues in northern waters are acting to protect the state's marine ecosystems.  The Alaska Marine Conservation Council has created a website, http://alaskafisheries.org/, dedicated to ocean acidification and other threats to Alaska's fisheries and both the human economy and wildlife web that depend on them.  The web effort is an educational resource and also a portal for grassroots action to pass climate change legislation that would protect Alaska's valuable renewable marine resources.

Meanwhile, Cook Inletkeeper Board Member Tom Evans is in Houston, calling on Chevron to improve its drilling practices and environmental record in Alaskan waters  http://www.inletkeeper.org/energy/production.htm.  Chevron is the biggest producer in Cook Inlet and pumps nearly 2 billion gallons of toxic waste into Alaskan fisheries annually. 

Early in May, Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Alaska Wilderness League, World Wildlife Fund, and other Alaskan conservation stakeholders sent a letter and petition to Secretary of the Interior Salazar urging reconsideration of proposed exploratory drilling in the Arctic this summer in response to the disaster in the Gulf.  Learn more about their efforts at http://northern.org/news/sec.-salazar-urged-to-reconsider-shell-oil2019s-exploratory-drilling-in-arctic-ocean-planned-to-start-in-less-than-60-days and get the latest from a Defenders of Wildlife press release: http://www.defenders.org/newsroom/press_releases_folder/2010/05_26_2010_drilling_must_be_put_on_hold,_defenders_of_wildlife_says.php

These organizations highlight the potential of Alaskans to direct a responsible course that combines smart resource development and conservation with environmental stewardship to guarantee Alaska will remain vibrant for generations to come.

Friday, May 21, 2010

10:45AM--Conservation Leaders Meet with EPA Administrator Dennis McLerran

 

Last week leaders from Alaska's conservation community had the distinct privilege of meeting with EPA Regional Administrator Dennis McLerran. 
Organized by Cook Inletkeeper Executive Director Bob Shavelson and ACA Executive Director Caitlin Higgins, the meeting was the first with Mr. McLerran since he took the position this year.  Leaders from Alaska's environmental community attended the meeting which included other high level EPA officials.

The discussion broached a wide range of Alaskan topics on which the EPA has traditionally played a role.  From agricultural chemicals, to coal dust, to offshore drilling regulations, Alaska's conservation spokespeople presented their wide-ranging concerns for the good of the state.  Discussion was lively and open, as Mr. McLerran and his colleagues addressed each issue with a description of current protocol and future possibilities from the perspective of the federal office.

During the brief meeting Mr. McLerran spoke of a longtime affinity for Alaska and his many northern adventures by kayak and over land.  He was generally responsive to the concerns brought to the table, and expressed enthusiasm to work together with the greater conservation community in Alaska to protect citizen's health and the state's wild places.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

1:30PM--Conservation Community Convenes for ACA End of Session Meeting

Much of Alaska's conservation community gathered in Anchorage last week to celebrate a successful legislative session, evaluate performances, and deliberate future strategies.  The Alaska Conservation Alliance played host for the series of meetings, but much of the program was presented by the leaders in attendance from around the state.

An online communications workshop sponsored by Polly Carr and the Alaska Conservation Foundation was widely regarded as one of the most constructive sessions of the week. Michael Sharp, Communications Director for Cook Inletkeeper, presented web strategies and social media principles.  Not afraid to shoot straight, Sharp pointed out gaps in the conservation community's e-world and even more, pointed the way towards strategic development with an enthusiasm that no doubt sent attendees back to their offices with some hacking ahead of them.

Caitlin Higgins, Executive Director of the Alliance, led the traditional End of Session discussion around the theme of collective potential.  Toward that theme, leaders like Pam Miller of Alaska Community Action on Toxics and Emily Fehrenbacher of the Sierra Club presented successful methods for organizing and linking with non-traditional partners.  Framing the discussion around successes from the past year and overarching conservation goals, Caitlin pointed out ways to increase capacity from the community's statewide base.

Attendees also had the privilege of guest speakers Senator Lesil McGuire and Senator Bill Wielechowski.  Champions of pivotal conservation legislation during the 2010 session, the senators reflected that the year's successes represented a paradigm shift for energy and environmental policies in Alaska.  The veteran legislators shared stories from the trenches and gave their insight on how to best transcend traditional images and party norms to create positive state policy in the future.

The meetings also included discussion around the upcoming conservation priorities selection process for the 27th legislative session.  Looking forward, the community has a lot of momentum to utilize with the political scene ever-evolving and another session only months away.  The room had an optimistic tone as the event was concluded and the crowd filed out, headed back to work to keep Alaska great.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

3:00PM--Honoring the Life and Values of Wally Hickel

Alaska lost a visionary and champion of the environment last weekend with the passing of former Governor Wally Hickel.  His life was a testament to many of the qualities that make Alaska and Alaskans great: grandly ambitious, free thinking, and untamable.  A two-time governor, Hickel defied traditional partisanship, and was a big dreaming man of integrity above any political label. 

Although Hickel was not a traditional conservationist (one of his most famous quotes was “You can’t just let nature run wild”) he carried throughout his political life a respect for nature and embodied the idea of intelligent development. He saw the value in the unspoiled commons and the need to respect the environment while developing it for the greatest benefit of the people.  As the US Secretary of the Interior he defended the Everglades against rampant development and imposed strict clean up regulations on the oil industry after a spill off the coast of Santa Barbara, California.  He also advocated for Earth Day as a national holiday while the environmental movement grew during his brief tenure.

As governor of Alaska Hickel was a steward of the state’s resources for the good of its citizens.  He negotiated tough terms with oil companies to ensure Alaskan’s would be the beneficiaries of resource extraction, and commonly referred to Alaska as an “owner state”, ingraining the idea that development should be carried out with the greatest value by and for those who live here.  Wally Hickel appreciated the unique treasure and opportunity of Alaska, and all of us across the state can learn from his life while mourning his passing.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

4:30PM--Tileston Award Nominations Open

The Alaska Conservation Alliance and the Resource Development Council (RDC) both agree that economic development and environmental stewardship are not mutually exclusive goals. The Tileston award was created to acknowledge individuals and/or businesses that create solutions and innovations advancing both goals.  The “Tileston Award” is named in honor of two long-time Alaskans, Peg and Jules Tileston, who worked on seemingly different sides of conservation and development issues but who always agreed “that if it is in Alaska, IT MUST BE DONE RIGHT!”

The conservation community and the development community stand to learn from the example set by the Tilestons. We will get further by working together starting early in the process; by engaging in open, honest, and—above all—respectful dialogue; and by identifying together the overarching vision of how a successful project can and should balance environmental conservation and responsible resource development.

The 2010 nomination deadline is May 15, 2010. Please complete the nomination form.

4:35PM--ACA End of Session Meeting to be held in Anchorage on May 14th

The Alaska Conservation Alliance will be holding its End of Session meeting in Anchorage on May 14th.  The meeting is a chance to look back on the legislative session and to look forward over the current conservation landscape in Alaska.  In addition to a recap of wins and losses in Juneau over the past few months, the meeting will also address procedures and policies within the statewide conservation community.  Participants will discuss the current decision making and priority setting processes, while determining what strategies can maximize our collective power as environmentally concerned citizens.  Caitlin Higgins, Executive Director of the Alaska Conservation Alliance and there will be expert speakers from the non-profit and legislative sectors.  The event is scheduled from 9am to 3pm on Friday, May 14th, and will be held in Rasmusson Hall, Rm 316, at the Universitiy of Alaska, Anchorage.  Please RSVP to Susanna Orr at susanna@akvoice.org if you would like to attend.

Sunday, April 18, 2010

4:45 PM -- Priority Bill SUCCESS

SB 220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act and HB 306 State Energy Policy pass the House and Senate respectively. SB 220 is now transmitted to the Governor and HB 306 awaits concurrence.

 

 

Friday, April 16, 2010

 

7:42 PM -- Environmental Victories!

Senate Bill 243 Geothermal Resource: Royalty / Permit / Fee passed the House today with a vote of 27 Yes to Zero No with 13 Absent.

House Bill 20 Fisheries Loans: Energy Efficiency / Amount Passed the Senate today with a vote of 19 Yes to Zero No with one Absent. Upon Concurrence the bill will be transmitted to the Governor to sign into law.

 

11:06 AM -- Today's Floor Votes

House Floor

SB 243 Geothermal Resouce: Royalty / Permit / Fee

SB 277 Public Utility Exemption: Renewable Energy

Senate Floor

SB 309 Gas Exploration / Development tax credit

HB 20 Fisheries Loans: Energy Efficiency / Amount

 

10:34 AM -- Geothermal Royalty UPDATE

During a long day of bill hearings, the House Finance Committee took up and passed Senate Bill 243, a bill to promote geothermal resource development in Alaska. It is scheduled to be heard on the House Floor today.

Amidst lengthy bill discussions and a few passionately contested issues, SB 243 saw no obstruction and appeared to have wide support. The legislation will bring Alaska's geothermal royalty rate, currently the highest in the nation, down to that charged by the federal government. It also sets up statutory oversight regulations for the geothermal industry.

The decrease will promote development in a relatively untapped industry of huge potential here in the state.  Thus far the royalty rate has been a major barrier to entry. The legislature hopes that large scale projects such as the proposed 50MW Mt. Spurr geothermal plant will now move forward, easing Alaska's energy needs while bringing in some royalties to the state government.

The bill received four new co-sponsors in House Finance: Representatives Les Gara, Mike Hawker, Joe Thomas, and Anna Fairclough.

 

9:40 AM -- Legislation UPDATE

House Bill 20 up today for vote on the Senate Floor

HB 20 FISHERIES LOANS:ENERGY EFFICIENCY/AMOUNT: an Act relating to commercial fishing loans for energy efficiency upgrades and increasing the maximum amount for certain loans under the Commercial Fishing Loan Act; and providing for an effective date. ACV has a letter of support filed for this bill. The bill has changed some since first introduced. The loans available to Alaska fishermen, up to $400,000, are to be used for Energy Efficiency upgrades to vessel engines. Vessel hulls are no longer included.

The bill is sponsored by Reps. Bryce Edgmon, Bob Buch, Alan Austerman, Joe Thomas, Peggy Wilson, Cathy Munoz, Kyle Johansen, Beth Kerttula, Paul Seaton, Les Gara, Chris Tuck, Bob Lynn. And Senators Lyman Hoffman, Bert Stedman, Fred Dyson, Linda Menard.

 

HCR 22 up today in Senate Finance Committee in Senate Finance Rm 532. The meeting started at 9:00 AM [Passed (S) Finance Committee at 9:36 AM without objection]

HCR 22 ALASKA NORTHERN WATERS TASK FORCE: Establishing and relating to the Alaska Northern Waters Task Force. The bill is sponsored by (H) Community and Regional Affairs Committee. The bill has been well received.

 

8:09 AM -- Environmental Priority UPDATE

Last night the House Finance Committee heard and held Senate Bill 220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act. It was the bill's first hearing in (H) Finance. Sens. Lesil McGuire and Bill Wielechowski introduced the bill to the committee members, taking time to thank their staff Michael Pawlowski and Michelle Sydeman for their hard work on the bill.

The bill is expected to be heard again this morning for discussion of at least five amendments.

One of these amendments (#4), proposed by Reps. Les Gara and Joe Thomas, would strengthen the bill's energy efficiency provisions by adding a new section to AS 44.42: Retrofits and new construction for energy efficiency; energy efficiency report.

Another amendment (#3) by Gara and Thomas would allow the Dept. of Administration to consider energy efficient equipment when purchasing equipment that uses energy.

A third amendment (#5) would allow the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation and the Alaska Energy Authority to "promote energy conservation, energy efficiency, and alternative energy through training and public education."

House Finance Committee is scheduled to begin at 8:30 AM today in House Finance Rm 519.

Visit us on Twitter For up the minute reports on the progress of SB 220 and other conservation bills.

 

 

Thursday, April 15, 2010

 

Tax Day

1:31 PM -- HJR 40 Cook Inlet / Kachemak Beluga Population Passed the Senate today with 20 Yes votes.

SCS CSHJR 40(RES): opposing the proposed designation by the National Marine Fisheries Service of 3,000 square miles of upper Cook Inlet, the mid-inlet, all of the inlet's western shores, and Kachemak Bay as critical habitat for beluga whales.

Sponsors: Representatives Charisse Millett, Mark Neuman, Bob Lynn, Johnson, Wes Keller, Carl Gatto, Olson, Bill Stoltze, Kyle Johansen. And Senators Fred Dyson, Thomas Wagoner, Con Bunde, Lesil McGuire, Kevin Meyer, Bert Stedman, Charlie Huggins, Linda Menard.

 

12:56 PM -- Legislation UPDATE

Senate Bill 220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act was scheduled to be heard in the 8:30 AM House Finance Committee meeting today. The committee faced a busy schedule. The bill was not heard this morning.

(H) Finance is scheduled to meet at 1:45 PM to continue the morning meeting.

 

House Bill 36 Initiatives contributions was scheduled to be heard at 8:30 AM in Senate Judiciary Committee. The hearing was postponed.

 

House Concurrent Resolution 22 Alaska Northern Waters Task Force was scheduled to be heard in Senate Finance today at 9:00 AM. Time constraints and a full schedule postponed the Resolution's hearing until at least 1:45 PM today.

 

ACV Environmental Priorities:

House Bill 306 State Energy Policy is currently in Senate Finance Committee. It is not scheduled for a hearing.

 

Senate Bill 152 Regional Transit Authority is currently in Senate Finance. It is not scheduled for a hearing.

 

 

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

1:06 PM -- Alaska Coastal Management Program UPDATE

The debate over a plan to manage Alaska's coastline was taken up again in the Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday afternoon.  A new committee substitute for SB 4 Alaska Coastal Management Program & Alaska Coastal Policy Board, which provides new guidelines for the Alaska Coastal Management Plan, was presented by staff to bill sponsor Sen. Donald Olson.

The bill calls for more local oversight to ensure rural communities have a voice in the management of the land that supports their way of life.  The Committee Substitute presented Tuesday gave considerable power back to the state in an effort to compromise with those who opposed the bill for delegating too much power to individual communities on issues that have statewide influence.

Randy Bates, Director of the Department of Natural Resources opposed those changes. His approach was rebuked by Senator Hoffman, who admonished DNR for appearing to stall the process.  With only five days left legislators showed urgency in their work and disappointment at those who would slow the bill.

"You get to pick your own team", Hoffman told Bates, referring to an amendment that allows the governor to appoint all nine members of the Coastal Policy Board.  "We dealt you a winning hand - that's the ultimate, and it still isn't good enough.  That tells me you don't want to do anything."

Bates maintained that the state agency could still not support legislation that gave local authorities purview and veto power on issues of state interest.  The Senate Finance Committee members, a majority of whom represent coastal districts, asked that DNR respond with constructive comments on the bill by noon on Wednesday.

Bates was followed by the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Department of Law who also expressed continued opposition to the bill.  They too were asked by the committee to submit proposed, constructive changes by Wednesday.

The bill is expected to be brought up for further deliberation in Senate Finance after the receipt of those comments, possibly as early as Wednesday afternoon.

 

11:53 PM - Bills UPDATE

House Bill 306 State Energy Policy was not heard today in Senate Finance Committee. It is expected to be heard in that committee tomorrow.

 

HB 36: Initiatives: Contributions / Procedures was heard, amended and held today in Senate Judiciary Committee. (S) Judiciary has scheduled another hearing for the bill for Thursday at 8:30 AM in Butrovich Rm 205.

 

SB 312 Vessel Passenger Tax passed Senate Finance today and was placed on the bottom of the Senate Calendar.

Vote:

• Do Pass: Sens. Lyman Hoffman, Bert Stedman
• No Recommendation: Sens. Charlie Huggins, Joe Thomas, Dennis Egan, Johnny Ellis, Donald Olson

 

Still to come...

(H)Labor & Commerce Standing Committee
Wednesday at 3:15 PM in Barnes Rm 124
SB 243 Geothermal Resource: Royalty / Permit / Fee
SB 277 Public Utility Exemption: Renewable Energy

(S)Resources Standing Committee
Wednesday at 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205
HJR 45 Oppose Federal Cap And Trade Legislation
HJR 49 Opposing EPA Clean Air Act Regulations
HB 70 Alaska Grown Agricultural Products

 

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

4:47 PM -- Bills up Tomorrow

HB 306: State Energy Policy has been scheduled for a hearing in Senate Finance Committee at 9:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532

+ Other Bills scheduled to be heard in Senate Finance:
Wednesday at 9:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532
SB 312 Vessel Passenger Tax
SB 309 Gas Exploration \ Development Tax Credit
HB 280 Natural Gas: Storage / Tax Credits

HB 36: Initiatives: Contributions / Procedures has been scheduled for a meeting in Senate Judiciary Committee at 8:30 AM in Butrovich Rm 205

(H)Labor & Commerce Standing Committee
Wednesday At 3:15 Pm In Barnes Rm 124
SB 243 Geothermal Resource: Royalty / Permit / Fee
SB 277 Public Utility Exemption: Renewable Energy

(S)Resources Standing Committee
Wednesday At 3:30 Pm In Butrovich Rm 205
HJR 45 Oppose Federal Cap And Trade Legislation
HJR 49 Opposing Epa Clean Air Act Regulations
HB 70 Alaska Grown Agricultural Products

 

7:35 AM -- Today's Bills to Watch

(S)Finance Standing Committee 9:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532 

• HB 20 Fisheries Loans: Energy Efficiency / Amount
• HB 306 State Energy Policy

Senate Judiciary Standing Committee 9:15 AM in Butrovich Rm 205 

 

• HB 36 Initiatives: Contributions / Procedures

 

 

Monday, April 12, 2010

9:35 AM -- Big weekend for conservation legislation

Senate Bill 220: Alaska Sustainable Energy Act passed the Senate Saturday afternoon with a unanimous yes vote. The timing allowed the bill to be read on the House Floor and referred to (H) Energy then (H) Finance committees.

SB220 is scheduled to be heard this morning at 10 AM in (H) Energy Committee, Barnes Rm 124.

 

HB 306 State Energy Policy passed (S) Resources Committee Saturday afternoon. It is now referred to (S) Finance Committee.

 

HB 36 Initiatives Contributions Procedures passed the House late in the evening of Sunday, April 11. The vote was 35Y to 5N with No votes from Reps. Sharon Cissna, Harry Crawford, David Guttenberg, Scott Kawasaki, Beth Kerttula

 

 

HCR 22 Alaska Northern Waters Task Force passed the House on Saturday, April 10 with a unanimous yet vote. The Senate read the bill the first time on Sunday and referred it to (S) Finance. 

Arctic sea ice is depleting, and "the rate of depletion is accelerating...," the resolution reads. This is "altering fish and wildlife habitats" and "is affecting polar route navigation by opening oceans previously frozen year-round..." The opening of the Arctic Ocean has also increased efforts to protect resource interests by other Arctic nations; Russia, Canada, Greenland.

The resolution, sponsored by Community and Regional Affairs committee, should set up a task force to coordinate Alaska and US Arctic interests.

 

 

 

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

1:13 PM --  Alliance Priority UPDATE

3:00 PM -- Hearing Canceled

Senate Bill 220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act is scheduled for a hearing in Senate Finance today at 1:30 PM in Senate Finance Rm 532. A new Committee Substitute for the bill is expected to be released.

 

Friday, April 02, 2010

1:42 PM -- Week in Review

It was a busy week for natural gas with hearings on at least seven separate gas related bills.

• HCR 2: the Rules Committee added a (H) Finance referral to HCR2. (H) Finance moved SCS CSHCR 2(FIN) Out of Committee
• SB 305 moved out of (S) Finance Committee on the last day of March and passed through the Senate yesterday with only 3 No votes. It is scheduled for a hearing in House Resources on Wednesday, April 7.
• HB 377: (S)L&C: heard and held
• HB 229: (H) FIN: heard and held
• HB 414: (H) RES: heard and held
• SB 309: (S) RES: heard and held. Is scheduled for a hearing in Senate Resources on Monday, April 5.
• HB 369: (S) RES: heard and held

 

Legislators and the public were treated to a presentation in House Finance called "Federal Perspective on the Natural Gas Pipeline," by Larry Persily, Federal Natural Gas Pipeline Coordinator. Persily asked Alaskans to be realistic when contemplating the impact to state coffers of selling Alaska natural gas to the world market. And completion of the complex project won't be easy. However, the benefits to Alaskans of a large diameter pipeline are worth the effort, Persily said.

The U.S. natural gas market is 3X the size of the India, China and Japan markets combined.

"There is the very large U.S. Market. And then there is the LNG market," Persily said.

Persily's commments pointed toward a recommendation to pipe Alaska gas through Canada to the lower 48.

 

Hip hip hooray! Priority bills get their day in Committee

Senate Bill 220: Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy has another hearing scheduled in Senate Finance, April 5 at 10:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532. (S) Finance is the final Senate Committee to which SB 220 was referred.

House Bill 306: State Energy Policy has its first Senate hearing scheduled after passing the House of Representatives on March 17. Senate Resources Committee on Tuesday, April 6 at 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205.

Senate Bill 152: Regional Transit Authority is scheduled to be heard the second time in Senate Transportation Committee on Thursday, April 8 at 1:00 PM in Butrovich Rm 205.

 

Bills to Watch

Senate Bill 143: Railbelt Energy and Transmission Corp was heard in (S) Resources on Thursday April 1. Sen. McGuire and Sen. Wielechowski voted Do Pass and moved CSSB 143(RES) out of Committee

House Bill 182: Railbelt Energy and Transmission Corp was heard and held in (H) Energy Committee on Thursday, April 1.

House Bill 267: Snowmachine use on Dalton Highway was heard and held on March 31.

House Concurrent Resolution 22: Alaska Northern Waters Task Force passed (H) Community and Regional Affairs Committee on Wednesday, March 31. It is scheduled for a hearing on Tuesday, April 6 in (H) Finance.

 

 

 

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

10:45 AM -- Today in the Legislature

 

HB 267 Snow Machine use in Dalton Highway Corridor

• Today at 1:00 PM in (H)Resources Committee, BARNES Rm 124

 

Annual Address by the Honorable Mark Begich, U.S. Senator

• Today at 11:00 AM in (S) (H)Joint Session, House Chamber

 

Monday, March 29, 2010

12:10 PM -- UPDATE: Greater Railbelt Energy and Transmission Corp.

The Alliance continues its work to follow the Greater Railbelt Electricity and Transmission Corporation, or GRETC, bill this week, after committees in both houses brought up their versions of the bill for consideration. If the bill is passed, the six Railbelt utilities could come together in a region-wide, single utility that would be responsible for generating and transmitting electricity. The six smaller utilities would remain in existence to distribute the power to us, the ratepayers.

Language now under consideration has changed dramatically from the original legislation introduced by then-Governor Palin last year. Changes resulted after Railbelt utilities joined forces in the interim to develop their own version of the proposal. Current language is reported to have strong support from all six Railbelt utilities.

Utility consolidation can potentially provide many benefits for the Railbelt region if the utility is set up correctly. Through this bill, the legislature has an opportunity to create an entity that can bring important energy improvements reality by improving the level of coordination among the utilities and making new power projects more affordable. The Alliance is watching to see if the way this bill sets up the utility will give renewable energy and energy efficiency a fair opportunity to join the Railbelt power mix.

During a committee hearing on Thursday, Senate Resources committee members heard from AEA staff and attorneys as well as several of the Railbelt utilities about the changes in the bill. While there are many changes, the issue highlighted by both AEA attorneys and committee members was the language proposal that left the single utility unregulated.

The Alliance’s Executive Director Caitlin Higgins had the opportunity to share testimony with the committee, as well. In it, the Alliance requested that the committee pay special attention to making demand-side energy efficiency a priority in the big utility’s energy planning, ensuring the new entity would be subject to financial and regulatory oversight, creating a fair and diverse governance structure, and providing the public opportunities for meaningful input to the single utility’s decisionmakers.

The Senate Resources committee ended public testimony on Thursday and is expected to bring the bill back up for consideration in coming days. They have asked utilities and other stakeholders to prepare comments on the benefits of both regulation and deregulation so that they may have an informed discussion on the issue. If the Resources committee passes the bill, it will then go to the Senate Finance committee before reaching the Senate floor and going over to the House.

The House Special Committee on Energy also heard presentations on GRETC legislation on Thursday. They, too, had questions about changes to the bill and spent time asking AEA attorneys about provisions involving regulation, gas storage and whether or not all utilities would have to participate in the proposed new entity (as written, the new entity would begin when four of the six agree to join). The committee ran short on time and expects to bring AEA attorneys back to present on the remainder of the bill on Tuesday, March 30. They have not yet begun public testimony.

If the Energy committee passes the bill, it then goes to the House Labor and Commerce and House Finance before reaching the House floor and going over to the Senate.

The Alliance is asking that organizations interested in signing on to a letter asking the legislature to consider provisions including energy efficiency, regulatory oversight, good governance, and public input contact Statewide Energy Coordinator Elizabeth Outten at elizabeth@akvoice.org.

 

Thursday, March 25, 2010

12:27 PM -- Senate Finance heard SB 220 Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy this morning for the first time. Public testimony was held with 12 testifiers including Caitlin Higgins, Executive Director of Alaska Conservation Alliance and Alaska Conservation Voters. The testimony was overwhelmingly positive with some suggestions to change specific provisions of the bill. Alaskans from Cordova to Nome called in to offer support.

Senate Finance will take SB 220 up again today at 1:30 PM.

 

Sunday, March 21, 2010

10:37 AM - ACA Energy Efficiency Spotlight

Common sense energy solutions powering a home outside of Girdwood

-- Vlad Smolkin

Vlad Smolkin submitted this essay as part of ACA's energy efficiency photo contest.

 

As I was traveling down a windy dirt road outside of Girdwood, I couldn’t help but wonder how some of these remote houses were powered.  Often times I did not see any electric utility poles, which likely meant that they were too far away from the power grid of the town.  After several miles of wandering along this road, which eventually led to the Crow Creek mine, the houses were further and further apart.  I looked into the distance at one of the older looking cabins and noticed two solar panels set upon poles in a section of the front yard. The yard was cleared out in order to get more direct light. 

There was something beautiful in this juxtaposition of modern technology with the untouched and pristine landscape that surrounded it.  It seems natural that a house would thrive upon the same material as the trees and plants around it, a true coexistence. Seeing these panels in such a remote place really emphasized to me the idea that energy independence is something that can work for the individual as well as on a larger scale.  It just seems to make sense.

 

Friday, March 19, 2010

11:48 AM --  SB 220 Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy, and Alaska Conservation Voters legislative priority, has been scheduled for a hearing in Senate Finance on March 25th at 9:00 AM.

No word yet on public testimony.

 

Monday, March 15, 2010

11:52 AM -- Alaska’s Emerging Technology Potential: Hydrokinetic

Hydrokinetic project, Ruby Alaska, Yukon River Inter Tribal Watershed Council

Alaska has great potential for hydrokinetic energy development in navigable waterways and tidal basins. Hydrokinetic technology takes advantage of moving water to power turbines much like a windmill uses moving air and is on the cusp of becoming a commercially viable technology. The turbines are capable of producing energy without dams or water diversions, and apply regional and culturally appropriate technologies that could help meet the energy needs of many Alaskans.

The first in-river hydrokinetic turbine was installed in Ruby, Alaska in 2008 by New Energy. The 5kW device is the first successful installation of its kind in the United States.  There are several other projects on the drawing board and while there are obvious opportunities for development, challenges remain. The performance of hydrokinetic technology devices and their potential environmental impacts remain largely unknown when applied to the climatic conditions of Alaska. Another challenge is funding. 

Most funding sources favor proven technologies, not new emerging technology. The proposed Emerging Energy Technology Fund will provide a funding mechanism for these types of new technologies which in addition to producing clean energy, have the potential to create jobs and improve our quality of life.

 

March 12, 2010

3:38 PM -- Railbelt Energy options in House Energy: Black & Veatch finds renewable energy best for Southcentral Alaska

Last night, the House Special Committee on Energy heard reports on the recently completed Regional Integrated Resource Plan (RIRP) for the Railbelt region. With funding from the legislature, the Alaska Energy Authority recently completed this RIRP with input from an advisory committee. The plan, drafted by energy economists at Black and Veatch, outlines energy projects that make economic sense for the Railbelt region over the next 50 years. 

The final version of the plan, released yesterday, includes several renewable projects that if created, could move the Railbelt towards a cleaner, more stable economic future. This includes projects like the Fire Island Wind Farm and Mt. Spurr geothermal power plant. The final report also includes the proposed lake-tap hydro project at Lake Chackachamna as a viable future energy source for the Railbelt. While the Alliance and it’s member organizations are on record supporting  hydro power and the continued study of the Chackachamna lake-tap  venture to determine its fisheries, economic, water quality and conservation impacts, sufficient data is not yet available for decision makers to fully evaluate the project’s potential.    

When the draft report was first released, the experts at Black and Veatch highlighted that restarting Healy Coal Plant #2 was just too costly for our region and recommended that the plant remain in “mothball” status. Initial analysis included potential future carbon pricing that made the plant’s restart too pricy to be considered an economic part of the plan. After the draft’s release, coal proponents submitted comments saying that because carbon taxes are still in the proposed phase and are not yet a reality, Black and Veatch could not fairly include such pricing in their analysis. The final report reflects these comments. It removes potential carbon taxes from the analysis to include Healy #2, which would tie the region to a volatile, dirty, and potentially quite expensive source of energy, taking precious dollars away from projects that are stably priced and clean.  

The report also recommends a goal for energy efficiency that is considered low by most experts’ standards – just 8% energy efficiency gains over the report’s 50 year time horizon. The Alliance’s recently released Railbelt Electricity Efficiency Landscape (REEL) in Alaska Roadmap shows that the region could, in fact, make much more significant gains – as much as 50% – in just 15 years (Read more about the report).  That’s translates to gains of an easily attainable 3.3% each year between now and 2025. Though Black and Veatch found that a larger energy efficiency goal remained economic, concerns about the Region’s ability and willingness to implement a larger goal caused the experts to maintain the 8% recommendation. The Alliance continues to work with decision makers in all sectors to encourage that energy efficiency become our first priority and that the goals set in energy plans reflect that priority. 

So, where does the RIRP go next? While it’s possible for the legislature and individual utilities to use pieces of the report to make funding decisions and set priorities for legislation and new projects, the report is meant to be adopted and implemented by a yet-to-be created central, regional utility. While legislation is being discussed that would create this entity, it remains to be seen where it will go this session. The Alliance will keep an eye on this issue in the final weeks of session.

You can view AEA’s presentation to the legislature on the final RIRP here.

March 11, 2010

1:46 PM -- Questioning Snow Machines on Dalton Highway 

Representative Mike Kelly from Fairbanks has introduced HB 267 “An Act relating to travel by snow machine within five miles of the right-of-way of the James Dalton Highway." The corridor has been closed since the construction of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline and the proposed legislation violates a long standing commitment made by the State of Alaska to protect wildlife and subsistence use on the North Slope. 

The Dalton Highway was built for industrial purposes, to provide access to the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, countless mining operations and serves as a take off point for commercial guides and tour operators. The road conditions in winter provide hauling industries with the best opportunity to haul their heaviest loads to Prudhoe Bay. Increased traffic and abandoned snow machine trailers along the Dalton Highway pose a serious hazard for industrial truck traffic. None of the industries mentioned are in favor of allowing recreational motorized access in the Dalton corridor.

The eventual need to provide emergency and public safety services in this region begs the question of why there is no fiscal note attached to this bill. Opening the Dalton corridor to motorized access would require increased funding for the Division of Fish & Wildlife for law enforcement, increased funding for the Department of Transportation to include paving, building turnouts and parking lots, and increased funding for the Alaska Department of Public Safety to reinstate  a year-round pilot Trooper in Coldfoot.

Recently the Alaska Board of Game increased the bag limit for caribou in Unit 26B, the unit north of the Brooks Range that encompasses the Dalton corridor from 2 to 5. The increased bag limit combined with the proposed snow machine access will result in increased pressure on the Central Arctic Caribou herd and has serious potential to negatively affect local subsistence users.

The Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Alaska Native organizations and bow hunting groups are urging the State of Alaska to honor its commitment to protect wildlife and subsistence uses along the Dalton corridor, as well as provide a safe environment for industries and user groups that currently utilize the area by not passing HB 267.

 

March 09, 2010

9:13 AM - House Special Committee on Fisheries scheduled to hear HB 46: Mixing Zones

Scheduled to be heard in (H) Fisheries Special Committee on Tuesday March 9th at 10:15 AM in BARNES Rm 124

Sponsored by Rep. Paul Seaton (R)-Homer HB 46 deals with water quality issues and aims to protect Alaska’s citizens and fisheries. 

The bill would compel the Department of Environmental Conservation to collect and make public information regarding the type and amount of pollutants discharged by holders of mixing zone permits.  

Secondly it would temporally expand current mixing zone limitations, making it illegal to release regulated effluent in spawning zones at all times, not only during spawning season.

Finally, the bill requires a public notification and period for comment to accompany all proposed commercially operated sewage discharge increases of over 50%.

 

March 08, 2010

8:09 PM - Senate Bill 220: Alternative Energy / Energy Efficiency passed out of (S) Resources Committee today. The yea vote was unanimous.

Committee members added several amendments to the omnibus energy bill including amendments that address; nuclear regulation; compressed natural gas vehicles for the state fleet; expanding the Southeast Energy Fund; and leverages $18 in federal State Energy Program funds for a $250 million energy efficiency revolving loan fund among others.

SB 220 now moves to (S) Finance Committee. It has not been scheduled for a hearing.

 

March 08, 2010

12:11 PM - House and Senate Resources Committees to hear ACA Priority Legislation today.

 

(H)Resources Standing Committee

Mar 08 Monday 1:00 PM in Barnes Rm 124

HJR 49 Opposing Epa Clean Air Act Regulations

SJR 22 Federal Preemption Of Salmon Management

HB 306 State Energy Policy

Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled

 

(S)Resources Standing Committee

Mar 08 Monday 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205

SB 220 Energy Efficiency/ Alternative Energy

SJR 27 Fed. Funding: Domestic Seafood Marketing

SB 274 William Jack Hernandez Fish Hatchery

SB 208 Dnr Study On Natural Gas

SB 144 Musk Oxen Permits

Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled

 

 

March 05, 2010

8:36 AM - Alaska Mobility Coalition's "Going is Good" campaign

ACA Member Group: Alaska Mobility Coalition

From Southeast Alaska to Fairbanks and beyond, twelve public transportation systems in Alaska provide more than 7 million passenger trips per year. The "Going is Good" campaign is designed to tell the story of those riders. Newspaper and radio spots feature testimonials of public transportation users talking about why they ride the bus and how it impacts their lives.

According to AMC Executive Director, David Levy, "The objectives of the campaign are to educate the non-riding majority, particularly decision makers, about the benefits which public transportation delivers to individuals and the community as a whole, and to build an awareness of the transit services available, so that when someone needs or desires to try transit, they will know where to turn."

Resources Here and Here

 

March 01, 2010

3:54 PM - Propelled By Fears of Negative Economic Impact, HJR 40 Moves On

Today the House passed House Joint Resolution 40: Cook Inlet Kachemak Beluga Population. The bill now moves to the Senate. The resolution, sponsored by Representative Charise Millett and co-sponsored by a host of other Republican legislators, opposes the designation of 3,000 square miles of Cook Inlet as critical habitat for the endangered beluga whale. The arguments for passage of HJR 40 have centered on the fear that Alaska cannot both protect the Beluga and continue to grow our economy. This claim is in dispute.

The population of beluga whales was estimated at 321 in 2009, and has been on the rise since outcries over their endangerment caused regulations be put in place over the past decade.  By designating critical habitat, the National Marine Fisheries Services says it aims to further that protection to ensure continued healthy growth of the still endangered population.

A host of testifiers lined up on Wednesday to argue against that protection on Wednesday.  

Members of the commercial and sport fishing industries all the way through representatives from the oil and gas sector have spoken out against the designation, claiming it will have major negative economic consequences.  Although it is unknown what effect the continuation of current use practices and further pollution will have on the beluga whale, it was made very clear that any further regulation through a critical habitat designation will have negative economic repercussions.

This economic forecast carried the day as the resolution, with overwhelming support in the hearing, was moved out of committee. Carrying Zero Fiscal Note, HJR 40 passed out of the House on March 1st, after its third reading and a Reconsideration request by Rep. Kyle Johansen. On reconsideration, one no vote switched and the Bill passed 31 Yes to 2 No. The current version, CSHJR40(RES), is headed for the Senate. 

 

 

12:49 PM - New plan for state building energy efficiency retrofits comes into focus

A new plan for energy efficiency retrofits to state buildings is gaining momentum in the legislature.  The concept was first introduced in January at the governor's request as HB 296, but was also adopted yesterday by the Senate Resources Committee as an amendment to SB 220.  This amendment would create an energy efficiency revolving loan fund managed by the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC), which would provide loans to state agencies and municipalities to complete energy efficiency retrofits.  The process would involve an innovative financing method that allows state and municipal building managers to pay back the loans through energy savings resulting from the retrofits.

Here's how the AHFC describes how this program would work:

As an example, a municipal government or school district would have an energy audit done on their building. Let’s say the building needs $120,000 to make it more energy efficient and that those improvements would reduce their energy costs by $20,000 a year. They would take a loan out with AHFC to do the work and then pay the loan back with the funds available due to the savings achieved through the energy efficiency improvements. After the loan is paid back those funds would be available to that government for other purposes or to reduce the size of its budget. This would result in less energy used by public buildings as well as ultimately saving public money.

There's a bit of an interesting back story to this fund.  Remember when former Gov. Palin rejected the State Energy Program funds in the federal Stimulus Bill last year?  The legislature overrode her
rejection, and Gov. Parnell decided to use $18 million of these stimulus funds for energy efficiency retrofits to public buildings.  This new bill/amendment would allow the AHFC to turn that $18 million into up to $250 million by selling bonds on the bond market.  The $250 million would become the start-up capital for the Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund. 

This is a new approach to retrofits to public buildings in Alaska--one that incorporates some of the benefits of the performance contracting language previously featured in SB 220 and SB 121.  The main difference is that the state (through AHFC) will be essentially being running the performance contracts instead of private businesses--though this bill would still create a lot of private sector jobs, especially for companies that complete energy audits on commercial buildings and for construction workers completing these retrofits.

Dan Lesh, Strategies for Alaska's Future Legislative Liaison for Energy Efficiency said, "I'm optimistic about this new concept and will keep a close watch as it moves through the Senate within SB 220 and in the House as HB 296.  It has the potential to get these retrofits going more quickly, and to allow more Alaska businesses to participate in the retrofits."  Stay tuned for more details.

 

February 25, 2010

6:30PM--Fly Over. Fly By.  Fly Around. And finally, the 2010 Legislative Fly-In
For those folks who have ever lived or worked in Juneau, you know what Iím talking about: the plane is angled on a downward descent as you prepare to land in the Capitol of Alaska.  You hear the wheels come down and the wing flaps moving as the pilot readies for touchdown.  Suddenly, there it is: the fog.  With a sudden lurch of acceleration, the plane rapidly ascends and you know, before the voice on the intercom says anything, that landing in Juneau is just not in the cards. The only question is, where are we headed now?

In the years the Alliance and Voters have been hosting the legislative Fly-In, bringing to Juneau Alaskans from across the state to advocate on conservation issues, the glacial fog has never reaped such havoc as this one.  While a large group of participants did make it into town, most were scattered throughout the Southeast, Ketchikan, Wrangell, Petersburg, Sitka and even Seattle. In spite of Mother Nature, the 2010 Fly-In was undoubtedly a success as participants made the most of all opportunities and a group of 12 stranded in Sitka even managed to proceed with the agenda in the first ever Sitka Fly-In!

Many eventually did make it to the legislative capitol and were able to meet with their elected officials, participate in the breakfast reception and Alaska Conservation Allianceís energy efficiency press conference on the REEL in Alaska Roadmap release. (links)  A big thank you to all of our Fly-In participants for your flexibility, support and willingness to roll with weather and make the most of a foggy situation.

 

February 19, 2010

Tomorrow in (H) Special Committee on Energy

Saturday February 20th at 10:00 AM in HOUSE FINANCE Rm 519

Overviews on Comparative Railbelt Energy Project Analysis:

• Susitna Hydro Project, by Alaska Energy Authority;
• Chakachamna Hydro Project, by TDX Power;
• In-State Natural Gas Pipeline, by Bob Swenson, In-State Gas Pipeline Coordinator;
• Coal Gasification and Fire Island Wind Farm, CIRI;
• Mount Spurr Geothermal Project, by Ormat

Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled

Teleconference

 

 

A Winner of the ACA Energy Efficiency Photo Contest: Daniel Cushing

 

Daniel Cushing’s view of a windfarm on St. Paul Island.

Wind power turbines have recently been constructed on the windswept Pribilof Islands in the Bearing Sea. During the winter of 2009, sea ice prevented fuel deliveries to the village of St. Paul, and the cost of gasoline soared above $14 per gallon. Wind power can reduce the community's dependence on fossil fuels.

 

February 17, 2010

4:00 PM--Alaska Conservation Voters weighs in on hydro power

Energy has certainly been a big focus for this year’s Alaska state legislature. The breadth of different energy topics being considered is quite broad, everything from Alaska Conservation Alliance and Alaska Conservation Voters’ priority legislation on renewable energygeneration, energy efficiency and public transportation, to the topics of furthering oil and gas development, coal, nuclear and hydro power projects.

Alaska, as we know, has a ton of renewable energy potential, and while technically not considered a renewable energy source by the Federal Government, Alaska is also blessed with a wealth of prospective hydro power projects, especially in Southeast. Hydro power is clean, reliable, reduces overall CO2 emissions and as a stably-priced energy source, can provide energy relief to Alaskans. However, not all hydro power projects are created equal, and proper care must be taken to ensure that the benefits of a hydro power project don’t come at too great an expense to other existing resources.

Taking these factors into account, Alliance member groups recently completed and approved a position paper on hydro power projects. It is designed to guide the conservation community’s evaluation of future Alaska hydropower projects using five principles and sets of questions. Read the Alliance Hydro Position Paper here. The central point of this position paper is that the Alliance members support regionally appropriately sized hydropower projects that are developed correctly with a strong emphasis on fisheries protection and sustaining Alaskans’ environmentally dependent economies and quality of life. This paper creates an important yardstick Alliance members can use to evaluate future energy projects.

A big thank you to those member organizations who helped draft, edit and ultimately created and approved the Alliance Hydro Position Paper.

February 15, 2010

Happy President's Day

8:45 AM -- Though today is a holiday, Senate Resources is scheduled to hear SB220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act at 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205. Testimony not scheduled.

Senate Resources has a busy week scheduled for SB220, with hearings on Monday, Wednesday and Thursday at 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205.

 

HB280 Natural Gas, is also scheduled for hearing today at 3:15 PM in Barnes Rm 124.

HB 280 an Act relating to natural gas; relating to a gas storage facility; relating to the Regulatory Commission of Alaska; relating to the participation by the attorney general in a matter involving the approval of a rate or a gas supply contract; relating to an income tax credit for a gas storage facility; relating to oil and gas production tax credits; relating to the powers and duties of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission; relating to production tax credits for certain losses and expenditures, including exploration expenditures; relating to the powers and duties of the director of the division of lands and to lease fees for the storage of gas on state land; and providing for an effective date.

Introduced as a prefile on January 15, HB280 has a long list of signers. Sponsored by Rep. Mike Hawker and Rep. Mike Chenault, it is signed by Rep. Craig Johnson, Rep. Kurt Olson, Rep. Joe Thomas, Rep. Jay Ramras, Rep. John Harris, Rep. Charisse Millett and Rep. Bob Lynn.

HB 280 is scheduled to be heard again Thursday, February 19th at 1:00 PM in Barnes Rm 124.

 

February 12, 2010

6:00 PM – Transportation Committee Debates Dedicated Transportation Fund

The House Transportation Committee met on Tuesday to discuss a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would create a dedicated transportation infrastructure fund.

If passed, HJR 42 puts the fund before the voters during the next general election. Representative Peggy Wilson shepherded the resolution through the committee, moving it out and to the House Finance Committee. Much of the Committee debate took place over the companion bill to HJR 42, House Bill 329.

Progress slowed as the committee took up HB 329 which holds the details of the proposed transportation fund. The bill proposes seeding the fund with a $1 billion allocation, and would sustain it through management of an endowment and additional contributions from state fuel taxes.

The bill provides a breakdown for fund expenditures of which 5% is dedicated to local public transportation and transit.  In addition to setting the terms of the proposed transportation infrastructure fund, the amendment also attempts to "promote and support methods or modes of local public transportation serving persons in various regions of the state" to the DOT&PF duties.

 

5:20 PM – HB 20 Moves On to the Senate Finance Committee

After deliberation in the Senate Resources Committee for the second week in a row, HB 20 energy efficiency loans for commercial fishermen, was passed on Thursday to the Senate Finance Committee. The bill allows commercial fisherman in Alaska to obtain loans of up to $400,000 to upgrade their vessels for improved energy efficiency. The bill is expected to bolster Alaska's fishing fleet, give the sluggish economy a boost, and reduce carbon emissions.

 

February 8, 2010

7:20 PM -- HB 36 Heard and Held in House Finance Committee

House Bill 36 An Act relating to ballot initiative proposal applications and to ballot initiatives was heard and held in House Finance today. There was no public testimony.

Introduced in the first prefile of 2009, the bill is believed to violate the Alaska constitution and aims to erode Alaskans’ use of the ballot measure as a means to pass legislation. This legislation extends beyond what its title implies and places heavy burdens on public interest groups. ACA/ACV decided last year to oppose SSHB 36. 

The bill is Sponsored by Rep. Kyle Johansen R-Ketchikan, Rep. Charisse Millett R-Anchorage, Rep. Peggy Wilson and signed by Rep. Craig Johnson and Rep. Kelly.

 

6:00 PM -- SB 59 Passes, Moves to Governor

Last Tuesday Senate Bill 59, An Act Relating to Low Speed Vehicles, was sent to the office of the Governor Parnell. Introduced by Senator Stedman, the bill would allow low speed vehicles, vehicles regulated to a maximum 25 mph, to have greater access to Alaskan roads in supporting municipalities with less than 35,000 people.

As electric vehicles have lower emissions and can be charged with renewable resources, this bill moves Alaska’s transportation system towards a cleaner, more sustainable future.

After passing both the House and Senate without a Nay vote, the bill now waits to be signed into law, and will be addressed by February 19th.

 

February 5, 2010

9:33 AM -- Let’s get state funding for public transportation movin’

Last week, Senate Energy Committee co-chairs Bill Wielechowski and Lesil McGuire sent a letter to the Finance Committee recommending, among other renewable energy priorities, funding public transportation as one component of a comprehensive statewide energy policy.

The funding measure would assist communities in leveraging federal dollars for public transit projects.  Currently, dozens of communities around the state are forced to “leave money on the table” because their municipal budgets are already stretched thin.  Anchorage’s People Mover eliminated three critical Eagle River routes this year because of cuts to the municipal budget. 

A similar plan was discussed during a House Special Committee on Energy hearing last Thursday.  However, some members of the committee said they were opposed to the idea of the state contributing funding to public transportation. Either because they felt it excluded communities without public transportation, they said, or because public transportation in general doesn’t pay it’s own way.

Though a village may not have a metro-scale bus system, it doesn’t mean it has no other transit requirements. This recent article from the Alaska Dispatch about public transportation in the Bush illustrates unconventional and adapted ideas of transit to fit Alaska’s unique rural characteristics:

Also, it is true that most public transit does require a subsidy and can’t pay its own way through collected fares alone. This is indicative of many transportation systems. Roads do not fully pay for themselves. They require yearly maintenance and gas taxes don’t include the true cost of traffic congestion on air quality and lost worker productivity. One need only look to a recent article in the Anchorage Daily News about the Governor’s proposed Road to Nome, a nearly $3 billion project that would require an estimated $40 million per year in maintenance costs.

As we all know, though the costs of roads, airports, ports and bus stops are always high, the full social benefits of all transportation would be very hard to quantify.

http://www.adn.com/front/story/1111745.html

So the debate really isn’t about whether a certain transportation project pays its way so much as it is where we direct our subsidies, and whether it efficiently meets the needs of residents, promotes desired outcomes of reduced environmental impacts, and reflects the true costs and impacts.

Creating a state granting program for communities will promote public transportation and enable communities to provide and expand transit service. It will promote options for Alaskans for getting to work or to shopping districts. It will help lower highway maintenance costs by lowering Vehicle Miles Traveled. And, importantly in our post-earmark era, capture more federal revenue for Alaska.

 

February 4, 2010

4:15PM -- What the recent Supreme Court decision on corporate personhood means to Alaska and Alaska Conservation Alliance and Alaska Conservation Voters.

Many questions have arisen across the state of Alaska about the effect that the recent United States Supreme Court decision overturning the prohibition of independent expenditures by corporations, unions, and special interest will have on our local elections. There is a great deal of rhetoric flying around the news and the internet about this issue.

Here are some facts:

• “On Jan. 21, 2010, a divided Supreme Court removed limits on independent expenditures that are not coordinated with candidates' campaigns. The 5-4 majority also struck down part of the 2003 McCain-Feingold law that barred union- and corporate-paid issue ads in the closing days of election campaigns.
• The ruling leaves in place a prohibition on direct contributions to candidates from corporations and unions.”
• Currently, both the Alaska Public Offices Commission, which monitors and regulates campaign law and lobbyists throughout the state as well as a team compiled by Alaska State Attorney General Dan Sullivan are researching the decision and determining the effect it will have on state campaign law.
• What is clear is that this ruling does not affect contributions to a political candidate or a campaign which, in Alaska can only be made by an individual or a political action committee. The decision deals solely with independent expenditures or issue based advertising by a third party with no coordination allowed between the third party and the campaign. For example an ad that runs supporting Candidate Jane Doe for Governor, but paid for by an entity other than Candidate Doe’s Campaign.

For a complete list of Campaign Contribution Limits & Restrictions in Alaska click here or visit http://doa.alaska.gov/apoc/pdf/2009ContributionLimits.pdf.
http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/1123571.html

Sources:

Oyez - http://otd.oyez.org/articles/2010/01/21/justices-roll-back-campaign-spending-limits-landmark-case-jan-21-2010

KTUU - http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=11879920

 

A Ballot measure or "Initiative" (also known as popular or citizen's initiative) provides a means by which a petition signed by a certain minimum number of registered voters can force a public vote (plebiscite) on a proposed statute, constitutional amendment, charter amendment or ordinance, or, in its minimal form, to simply oblige the executive or legislative bodies to consider the subject by submitting it to the order of the day. It is a form of direct democracy." (source) Unlike a bill introduced in the legislature, a ballot initiative is not subject to the rigorous vetting process by the legislature and can not be vetoed by the Governor. In Alaska the initiative process was most recently amended in the State Constitution in 2004 and now requires state wide proportional representation, or 21,000 individual signatures of registered voters gathered from 30 out of 40 legislative districts before a proposed ballot measure can be certified for a statewide vote.

HB 36, first introduced in January 2009 by Representative Kyle Johansen and co-sponsored by Representatives Charisse Millett, Peggy Wilson, Craig Johnson, and Mike Kelly, seeks to further change the ballot initiative process and significantly increase the reporting requirements for individuals and organizations that sponsor or participate financially in the process, much in the same way that individual campaigns are required to report their donors.

It would also require that prior to the signature gathering process, the proposed ballot initiative would have to have public hearings in each of the four judicial districts across the state featuring, at a minimum, written testimony by at least one pro and one con proponent on the issue and require that more information regarding ballot initiatives be included in the voter pamphlets for regular and special elections. 

HB 36 would also change the way signature gatherers are allowed to operate and the way in which they can be paid for their efforts.

What HB 36 does not do is regulate the source of funds that an initiative can solicit from in or out of state. It also changes the way that proposed ballot measures can be worded.

According to the sponsors of the bill, HB 36 would create a more open and transparent ballot measure process in keeping with the wishes of voters across Alaska who overwhelming supported ethics reform in 2007. According to opponents of the legislation, our initiative process is sufficiently onerous and the HB36 seeks to fix a problem that does not exist in this state.

Below are some resources to help you in forming your own opinion about this important issue:

--

To read the the full text of the current incarnation of HB36 for yourself, click (HERE.)

--

For differing viewpoints on this issue visit these sources:

Rep. Johansen's Sponsor Statement published on his Legislative Website (HERE)

Steve Cleary's OpEd published last year in the Juneau Empire (HERE)

 

February 3, 2010

2:30 PM -- Senate Resources Committee to Discuss Important Energy Legislation

Today the Senate Resources Committee will be holding a session to discuss important energy legislation.   The first piece up for deliberation is SB 220, the Senate Omnibus Energy Bill on which there has already been some discussion and much positive testimony. The bill, dubbed the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act, lays out a state energy policy and includes previously submitted proposals addressing a wide variety of pressing energy issues. 

Time permitting, the committee will also discuss HB 20, an act pertaining to commercial fishing loans to upgrade vessels for the purpose of improving energy efficiency.  The bill comes to Senate Resources with overwhelming support from the House, and has also been referred to the Finance Committee.

Alaska Conservation Alliance will be at the hearing following today's events.  Keep up with us on our website or check for updates on Facebook or Twitter.

 

1:45 PM -- House Special Committee on Energy passes HB 306

 The Alaska state legislature made progress towards a statewide energy policy on Tuesday as the House Special Committee on Energy passed HB 306.  The proposal aims to lay the foundation for a state energy strategy that will provide reliable, affordable energy to citizens across Alaska.  It also sets specific goals for energy efficiency and increased use of renewable energy sources.  HB 306 is now on its way to the House Resources Committee for approval.

 

January 28, 2010

2:45 PM -- Great Turnout at SB 220 Hearing Yesterday

 

The Senate Resources Committee took public testimony on SB 220, the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act, yesterday. Thirty-one people testified, all in support of the bill. Testifiers included individuals from the Alaska Municipal League, Southeast Conference, Sealaska Corporation, the Alaska Ratepayers Association, the Cascadia Green Building Council, the Alaska State Home Builders Association, and the Alaska Sealife Center, among other organizations. We also heard from several Alaskan energy entrepreneurs interested in the Emerging Technology Fund. Many of these entrepreneurs suggested that the state encourage the sharing of data on emerging technologies, so "we can all grow together."

The response from Senators on the committee, audience members at the hearing, and legislative staff appeared quite positive. The Alaska Conservation Voters and its sister organization the Alaska Conservation Alliance helped organize testifiers and we're pleased with the result. As one person testified last night "It's great to hear all these engaged, intelligent voices and know that these people live in Alaska and are helping shape our future."

 

12:46 PM -- U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski Pushes "Dirty Air Act"   Senator Lisa Murkowski has introduced S.J. Res. 26 in the U.S. Senate. This measure would reverse a Supreme Court ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency can regulate greenhouse gasses. It would essentially weaken the Clean Air Act. This immediate threat to progress on climate change must be defeated. Please contact Senators Murkowski and Mark Begich now (see below for contact information).

Consider this: 

• The Clean Air Act is a law with a nearly 40-year track record of cutting dangerous pollution to protect human health and the environment and spur innovation and efficiency.
• Global Warming is heating up the planet right now: Temperatures this decade have been higher than any other decade on record, and one degree (F) higher than average temperatures in the 20th century.
• Ocean temperatures worldwide this summer were hotter than ever previously recorded.
• Sea ice extent in the Arctic melted to its third lowest recorded level this summer. Sea levels are projected to rise faster than we thought since the last time the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change weighed in. Without emission reductions, a 2.6 foot rise is likely by the end of the century and a 6.6 foot rise is possible.
• Carbon dioxide levels for2009 (387 parts per million) are the highest they have been in at least 800,000years and possibly as long as 15 million years.Globally, an estimated 8.7 billion tons of carbon were emitted in 2008 from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas, a more than 40 percent increase from 1990.
• The ocean's ability to absorb carbon dioxide is declining as the ocean heats up and becomes more acidic. In 1959, the ocean absorbed 60 percent of the extra Co2 we put into the atmosphere. In 2008, it only absorbed 55 percent.
• Studies indicate that the Earth will take a long time-at least a thousand years-to come back into balance and recover from the excess CO2 we are putting into the atmosphere. Every day of delay locks in more warming for ourselves and future generations.

 

Sen. Lisa Murkowski Sen. Mark Begich 10:50 AM -- Visit Juneau during the Legislative Session

I'm just a bill.  A bill on (Juneau's) Capitol Hill.  Ok, I've modified the song just a bit, but most of us probably remember this Schoolhouse Rock ditty, learning about the process for a bill to become law.  But, have you ever been to Juneau and witnessed the process in action?  Have you ever sat in on a committee hearing and watched the interplay between committee members and observed the rules of conduct?  Have you ever scheduled a meeting with your state senator to advocate on issues that matter to you and your neighborhood?  Or had your state representative introduce you on the floor?    

It's a powerful experience, and one that I recommend for every Alaskan.

You can see for yourself that the process the song outlines is much the same, but passing a law is not as simple as the song suggests.  There are politics and personalities in play, priorities and budget

considerations to take into account.   In other words, it's a process that involves real people. By coming to Juneau, you have the opportunity to meet with those people, the people who represent your district, present your perspective and influence legislation.

It doesn't even require a trip to Juneau, thanks to the Legislative Information Offices, which can be found in most Alaskan communities, or you can meet with your legislators during the interim, when the session is over and the elected officials are back in town.  But for the full experience, for the chance to roam the halls of the capitol and connect one-on-one with your legislators, a chance to address laws that impact you as they're being considered, traveling to Juneau during the session is the best.

That's where Alaska Conservation Alliance can help. Our legislative Fly-In brings motivated individuals down to Juneau for three days to learn about the legislative process, get up to speed on hot-topic energy legislation (like renewable energy and energy efficiency), and finally, meet with your legislators and advocate on this legislation.  You can learn more about our energy priorities on this  Web site.

So if renewable energy and energy efficiency issues are important to you and you want the experience of traveling to Juneau and becoming an advocate, consider signing up with us.  Applications are on this website.

 

January 26, 2010

11:27 AM -- Today at 3:00pm the House Energy Committee will be meeting to hear HB 305: Omnibus Energy Bill, and HB 306: State Energy Policy. These bills share some similarities with the Senate Bill 220: Alaska Sustainable Energy Act such as the inclusion of explicit goals for energy efficiency and renewable energy production. However, there are also important differences with regards to nuclear and coal.

We will be attending the hearing and reporting back to keep you abreast of the committee climate and reactions to the presentation.  Or follow along on Gavel to Gavel.

 

January 25, 2010

Noon -- Next up: New Ferry Construction
The Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) is awaiting action from legislators regarding the go-ahead for a new Alaska Class ferry to serve routes in the Southeast.

Proposals for new ferries have long been in the works to replace members of the AMHS's aging fleet. The modern, energy-efficient design includes passenger comforts such as quieter running volume, improved seating, and group meeting spaces.

With design nearly complete, the project's future is now up to legislative funding. The Federal Government approved the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program with up to $60 million in December.

Governor Sean Parnell did not include funding for the new ferry in his 2011 budget. However, an amendment can bring those funds back into play and move the project into the construction phase.

 

January 21, 2010

5:23 PM -- Listen to Senate Resources Co-chairs Press Conference on SB220, Omnibus Energy Bill. (Sen. Bill Wielechowski and Sen. Lesil McGuire)

3:14 PM -- A quick update on some energy legislation introduced yesterday, specifically related to the priority bills.

Of the many energy related things introduced, one bill – the senate’s Alaska Sustainable Energy Act (SB 220) – was an exciting introduction that seems to have some traction. It was discussed yesterday in the Senate Resources committee and was scheduled to be discussed again today during the committee meeting. Today's meeting was canceled.

The Senate Resources committee introduced items with money attached to them this morning during a press conference at 11 a.m.
Included in the bill are 2 of our 3 priorities – the emerging energy tech fund and energy efficiency for public buildings bills.

Unfortunately, no Regional Transit Authority (SB 152) stuff. Bills like SB152 tend to stay in singular form, rather than being rolled into an omnibus, because they’re just too complicated to deal with in a giant package of bills. Though that doesn’t mean it won’t be eventually rolled in if the powers that be deem that appropriate.

This means that on the senate side, discussions about Energy Efficiency (SB 121) and Emerging Energy Technology (SB 150) will likely happen now in the context of SB 220.

10:09 AM -- The second hearing for SB 220, the Senate Energy Committee Omnibus Bill, will not take place in Senate Resources Committee this afternoon at 3:30pm.

January 20, 2010

The House and Senate Energy Committees each introduced new energy legislation Yesterday afternoon, HB 305, HB 306 and SB 220 respectively.

HB 306 "An Act declaring a state energy policy" was referred to the House Energy and Resources Committees.

HB 305 OMNIBUS ENERGY BILL was referred to the House Energy, Finance and Resources Committees.

SB 220 Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy was referred to Senate Resources and Finance Committees. Heard today, the bill is scheduled to be heard again Thursday in S RES at 3:30pm in Butrovich Rm 205.
 

January 19, 2010

Hello and welcome to the Alaska Conservation Alliance Web log.
Today here in Juneau the 26th Alaska State Legislature will open its doors to begin the 2010 legislative session. A slow economy on the verge of a predicted upswing, a series of upcoming elections, high but unpredictable fuel prices, and a series of energy proposals that will set the course for Alaska's future combine to set an exciting stage as officials from around the state converge on the capital.

The Alaska Conservation Alliance will be in the middle of the action throughout the term, working to make sure conservation minded Alaskans are heard. Simultaneously we will be keeping an ear to the ground so that we can help keep you informed of what is happening with our government and what policies are being enacted for the future of our state.